Publication
The conference offers three publication routes, each with its own conditions: the Abstract Book, the conference proceedings and journal opportunities.
Four Levels of Publication
Peer Review and Editorial Process
Abstracts and full papers are assessed through double-blind peer review under the oversight of the Scientific Committee. Reviewers consider relevance, originality, methodological quality and clarity. Authors may be asked to revise their work before a final decision; revised material must be sent using the update link in the reviewer's email and by the deadline it states.
Publication Ethics
Generative AI Author PolicyEvery submission is screened for similarity using iThenticate, part of Crossref Similarity Check. Similarity screening supports editorial judgement; it is not a verdict on whether AI was used.
Authors confirm that their work is original, unpublished and not under review elsewhere.
Generative AI may be used in manuscript writing only to improve the language and readability of the authors' own text, with disclosure. AI used in the research itself is described in the methodology. Applicable AI declarations are kept with the editorial record and accompany the published work where required.
Indexing and Visibility
Each paper in the proceedings is registered with a Crossref DOI. The proceedings are submitted to services such as Google Scholar and DOAJ; inclusion is decided by each service.
Publication Timeline
Authors who have already submitted an abstract send their full paper using the link in their original confirmation email, or by following the instructions in Help & Support.





